November 14, 2025

The Hidden Tax of Fragmented Development: Why Inconsistent Software Pipelines are a Business Liability

By
Ryan Skarin
A chaotic mess of software delivery pipelines with a price tag attached with the label, tax

Is Your CI/CD Process a Hidden Drag on Your Business?

The Software Supply Chain Bottleneck

For mid-market and enterprise-level companies, your code delivery is your digital supply chain. When you have hundreds of product teams using disparate tools and ad-hoc processes for delivery, it's like a global logistics operation where every regional office uses different vendors, incompatible paperwork, and a unique shipping schedule. The inevitable result is massive cost inefficiency, constant bottlenecks, and an unreliable final product.

Your software is your product, and its delivery should be a predictable, streamlined engine. Yet, many organizations are running on a fragile, fragmented system that’s costing them market share and exposing them to risk.

What does inconsistent software delivery look like?

A "Wild West" of Development

Your organization has hundreds of developers using a chaotic mix of coding languages, platforms, and over a dozen security tools that don't talk to each other.

Slow, Unreliable Delivery

Your CI/CD process isn't a true pipeline – it's a collection of ad-hoc, manual steps, chained makefiles, and random containers that are inconsistent across product teams. Getting a new project onboarded takes weeks or months of manual effort.

Security and Technical Debt Nightmare

Key software components and dependencies are deprecated or outdated, creating thousands of unpatched vulnerabilities and massive exposure to cyberattacks. 

Ultimately, an inconsistent and unreliable development process leads to an inability to meet customer needs in a timely fashion, hindering product launches, and ultimately impacting reputation and revenue.

The Cost of Ignoring Inconsistency

Ignoring a fragmented software delivery process isn't just a technical oversight; it's a financial and competitive high-consequence problem.

You Pay a Hidden Tax on Your IT Budget

Technical debt is the "tax" a company pays to live with existing technology issues. On average, organizations redirect 10-20 percent of their new product IT budget to resolving issues related to technical debt. This means money intended for innovation is constantly diverted to firefighting.

Development Speed is Crippled

When security checks are manual and pipelines are inconsistent, simple deployment tasks become complex, time-consuming hurdles. Gartner predicts that organizations that actively manage and reduce technical debt can achieve at least 50 percent faster service delivery times to the business, underscoring how severely high debt levels hinder delivery speed and erode your ability to compete.

Security Vulnerabilities Compound

Deprecated and unmaintained software is a self-inflicted cyber risk. Every unpatched dependency or outdated component is a convenient entry point for malicious actors, expanding your attack surface and risking a major security incident.

When every team is building its own "science project," the focus shifts away from delivering customer value toward managing complexity. You can't achieve predictable, repeatable, and secure delivery until you standardize the process itself.

Standardize, Automate, and Serve Your Developers

The path to transforming your software delivery lies in shifting from a chaotic, ad-hoc approach to an integrated, automated pipeline-as-a-service model built on three core pillars:

1. Standardized Platform Engineering (Pipeline-as-a-Service)

Eliminate inconsistent processes by consolidating all CI/CD onto a single platform (like GitLab or GitHub). Build a modular, automated pipeline that dynamically detects a project’s type (Python, Maven, Helm, etc) and automatically builds, tests, and packages the application based on a set of proven, consistent standards. This moves the onboarding of a new project from days of manual effort to minutes.

2. Integrated Security Automation ("Shift Left")

Embed security and quality into the pipeline from the very beginning. Implement automated scanning tools (static analysis, dependency checks) and automated dependency management to find and flag vulnerabilities and deprecated packages immediately. This dramatically reduces your exposure window, automatically managing software entropy and keeping your code up-to-date.

3. A Developer-Centric Culture

The goal of DevOps is to serve the developers. By providing a simple, standardized, and fully automated delivery experience, you take the heavy lifting of infrastructure and compliance off the development team's plate. This frees engineers to focus on high-value, core development work – the actual product features your customers want.

Trility's approach combines deep DevSecOps expertise with a business-driven lens to define a unified plan, implement an Infrastructure as Code (IaC) foundation, and then mentor your teams to own and maintain the new, simplified ecosystem.

Predictable Delivery and Risk Reduction

For one mid-market client with over 600 developers and more than 70 coding languages, Trility transformed an inconsistent and unreliable software development environment. The results were a foundation for predictable, secure delivery:

Deployment Steps Drastically Reduced

By moving to a pipeline-as-a-service model, you can eliminate manual steps and move to deployment more frequently and quickly.

PROOF: We helped reduce the manual deployment steps from 52 to 8, and the ability to do it in 50 minutes compared to eight days.

Accelerated Time-to-Market

In addition to reducing steps, simplified and automated delivery increases delivery frequency, which means clients experience new features and functionality more frequently – keeping them delighted.

PROOF: Our collaboration enabled daily and weekly internal releases and monthly external ones, an improvement over previous quarterly cadences.

Quantifiable Cost Savings

The streamlining and automation of previously manual processes lowers your total cost of ownership

PROOF: The chart below demonstrates how our work resulted in reduced development overhead and faster resource utilization with significant month-over-month cost savings in just four months of the year-long project.

The chart above shows the drop in cost by percent across 10 different teams from Month 1 to Month 4.

Cultural Shift to Ownership

Lastly, by empowering a DevOps team to own the delivery platform, they are able to shift from executing unstandardized requests to proactively guiding development and promoting consistent, reusable patterns. The end result: You achieve a simplified product engineering ecosystem that serves as a solid, auditable foundation for product lines and services, and assurance in its quality, reliability, and security upon commercial launch.

Simplify Operations, Accelerate Outcomes

Is a fragmented, ad-hoc delivery system keeping your business from realizing its product goals? It's time to stop paying the tax of technical debt and start focusing your engineering talent on delivering maximum value.

See how we helped a client solve this high-consequence problem.